Tuesday, July 08, 2014

Prevention: Home Visiting Programs Reduce Preventable Deaths

MedicalResearch.com reports good news on prevention from David Olds!

Home visiting programs make a difference.  Have one in your community?

If not, the Children's Alliance may be able to help:
http://www.childrensalliance.org/category/issues/home-visiting
Nurse Visitation During Pregnancy and Infancy Reduced Maternal and Child Mortality
Posted on by
MedicalResearch.com Interview with: David Olds, Ph.D. Professor of Pediatrics and Director Prevention Research Center for Family and Child Health University of Colorado Department of Pediatrics Aurora, Colorado   80045MedicalResearch.com Interview with: David Olds, Ph.D. Professor of Pediatrics and Director
Prevention Research Center for Family and Child Health
University of Colorado Department of Pediatrics

Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?Dr. Olds: We’ve conducted a randomized controlled trial of a program of nurse home visiting for low-income women with no previous live firths during pregnancy and the first two years of the child’s life, with randomization of participants beginning in 1990.
In our most recent follow-up of mothers and children in Memphis, those who received nurse-visitation were less likely to have died over a 2-decade period following the child’s birth than those in the control group.  Death among mothers and children in these age ranges in the US is rare and extraordinarily important for what it tells us about the health of the population studied in this trial.
For children, the reduction in death was present for preventable causes, that is, sudden infant death syndrome, injuries, and homicide.  All of the child deaths for preventable causes were in the control group, for whom the rate was 1.6%.  None of the nurse-visited children died of preventable causes.
The reductions in maternal mortality were found for two nurse-visited groups combined for this report: one received prenatal and newborn visitation and a second received visitation during pregnancy and through child age two.  Overall, mothers assigned to the control group were nearly 3 times more likely to die than those assigned to the two nurse-visited conditions.  The relative reduction in maternal mortality was particularly pronounced for deaths linked to maternal behaviors — suicide, drug overdose, injuries, and homicide; for these external causes of death, 1.7% of the mothers in the control group had died, compared to 0.2% of those visited by nurses.
Medical Research: Were any of the findings unexpected? Dr. Olds: All of these findings were unexpected as we thought that the rates of maternal and child mortality for women and children in these age ranges would be too infrequently occurring to discern program effects.
Medical Research: What should clinicians and patients take away from your report?Dr. Olds: Nurse visitation during pregnancy and the early years of the child’s life among low-income mothers with no previous live births is a promising means of improving maternal and child health and reducing maternal and child mortality.
Medical Research: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this study?Dr. Olds: These findings need to be replicated with other highly disadvantaged low-income families.
Citation:
Olds DL, Kitzman H, Knudtson MD, Anson E, Smith JA, Cole R. Effect of Home Visiting by Nurses on Maternal and Child Mortality: Results of a 2-Decade Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. Published online July 07, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.472. 
And more from HealthDay.com
Home Nurse Visits May Improve Survival of Moms, Babies
Deaths were far more common when poor women did not receive follow-up care, study findsHome Nurse Visits May Improve Survival of Moms, BabiesBy HealthDay ReporterMONDAY, July 7, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- Home visits from nurses during pregnancy and a child's first two years help improve survival odds for both mothers and children, according to new research.
The study followed more than 1,100 mother-child pairs from disadvantaged, urban neighborhoods in Memphis, Tenn., for two decades. Poor women have much higher death rates than wealthier women, according to background research in the study. And their children are more likely to die from accidents, homicide and sudden infant death syndrome, research has shown.
"Often these are mothers living on the margins of society," said study researcher David Olds, professor of pediatrics at the University of Colorado, Aurora. "And we now know if we reach out to them and engage them, we can make a big difference in the health and development of the mothers and the children, including their survival.''
The study, published online July 7 in JAMA Pediatrics, began in 1990. Researchers assigned the first-time mothers-to-be to one of four treatment groups.
One group received only transportation for prenatal care. Another received transportation plus screening for infants and toddlers to evaluate their development. A third group received transportation plus home visits. A fourth group received all the services.
Mothers without home visits were about three times as likely to die during the follow-up period as the moms who got nurse visits, Olds found. About 3.7 percent of those who weren't visited died compared to 1.3 percent of those who received all the services, including visits by nurses.
The children benefited as well. By age 20, those whose mothers received all of the services were still alive while 1.6 percent of kids whose moms got only transportation and screening had died, the study found.
The results didn't surprise Dr. David Mendez, an attending neonatologist at Miami Children's Hospital in Florida.
"Sometimes an extra pair of hands, an extra pair of eyes to see what's going on in the household with a new baby can be important," said Mendez, who was not involved in the study.
"Nurses perhaps take a role similar to what a good grandmother does," he said. "They are able to give the mother cues as to when the babies aren't doing so well [and may need medical help]."
The program -- known as the Nurse-Family Partnership -- operates in about 500 sites, Olds said. "The schedule calls for nurses to visit about once every two weeks during pregnancy and once a week for the first six weeks after delivery and then essentially every other week until the baby is 2 years," Olds said.
In this study, nurses completed about half of those visits, he said. In some cases, the get-togethers were difficult to schedule because some of the mothers became homeless and were hard to reach, he said.
While visiting, nurses discuss how to have a healthy pregnancy and how to be attentive to a child's needs, among other topics. On average, the publicly funded program costs about $9,000 per family over the 2.5 years of enrollment, Olds said.
According to one analysis, the return in savings from unneeded hospitalization and other health care services is about $5.70 for every dollar spent, he said.

The program is funded in various ways, he said. Some women have been covered under the Affordable Care Act. Others are supported by various state funds, he said.
The link between the at-home visits and improved survival is very strong, Olds said, although he can't say with certainty it is a cause-and-effect relationship.
However, "in this study, within the limits of statistical probability, we can say with 95 percent confidence that the mothers and children visited by nurses were less likely to die," he said. "That is almost as good as it gets."
More informationTo learn more about the prenatal period, visit the American Academy of Pediatrics.
SOURCES: David Olds, Ph.D., professor, pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colo.; David Mendez, M.D., attending neonatologist, Miami Children's Hospital, Miami, Fla.; July 7, 2014 online JAMA Pediatrics

Sunday, June 29, 2014

Teaching SBS Prevention Education in Schools: Speed Bump at the Churchville-Chili Middle School

Churchville-Chili Student Says Not Everyone Could Handle Shaken Baby Syndrome Lesson

  • ShareThis Facebook Tweet Email
  • Text size: + -
Rochester: Churchville-Chili Student Says Not Everyone Could Handle Shaken Baby Syndrome Lesson
Play now

A class at Churchville-Chili Middle School intended to teach students the dangers of Shaken Baby Syndrome is drawing controversy, after a Facebook post by a parent questioning the subject matter took on a life of its own.
The school district has investigated, and said in a statement that the allegations are not accurate, but said in the future, a counselor will be on hand in the classroom during the lesson.
The class is Family and Consumer Sciences. It's designed to prepare students to become life ready.
Angelina Libardi took the class at the beginning of the school year. She the lesson included video of a man being arrested for shaking his child, then showing that child hospitalized and clinging to life, and that was a bit much to take.
After the video, Angelina says the teacher would draw names at random and invite students to shake a specially designed doll where the brain lights up to show injuries caused from shaking.
"When I was called, I didn't want to go up, it was uncomfortable. I was very upset after the video, it was very sad. Some people would shake it but they were weird about it, they weren't happy, it was upsetting to them,” said Angelina, a 7th grader.
It's believed the concerned parent's son was in the class last week. The parent then posted on Facebook that "some kids found this hilarious and beat the snot out of that baby, throwing it against the wall."
A blogger picked up on this and used the post with the headline "Middle School Kids Learn How to SHAKE BABIES UNTIL THEY DIE."
Angelina believes this topic may be too advanced for 7th graders.
"There's some people in my grade that aren't as mature, can't take it as much. I don't know how to explain it. Maybe they're not as grown up and don't understand it as much."
- See more at: http://rochester.twcnews.com/content/news/746620/churchville-chili-student-says-not-everyone-could-handle-shaken-baby-syndrome-lesson/#sthash.4z7jhUsD.dpuf

Churchville-Chili Student Says Not Everyone Could Handle Shaken Baby Syndrome Lesson

  • ShareThis Facebook Tweet Email
  • Text size: + -
Rochester: Churchville-Chili Student Says Not Everyone Could Handle Shaken Baby Syndrome Lesson
Play now

A class at Churchville-Chili Middle School intended to teach students the dangers of Shaken Baby Syndrome is drawing controversy, after a Facebook post by a parent questioning the subject matter took on a life of its own.
The school district has investigated, and said in a statement that the allegations are not accurate, but said in the future, a counselor will be on hand in the classroom during the lesson.
The class is Family and Consumer Sciences. It's designed to prepare students to become life ready.
Angelina Libardi took the class at the beginning of the school year. She the lesson included video of a man being arrested for shaking his child, then showing that child hospitalized and clinging to life, and that was a bit much to take.
After the video, Angelina says the teacher would draw names at random and invite students to shake a specially designed doll where the brain lights up to show injuries caused from shaking.
"When I was called, I didn't want to go up, it was uncomfortable. I was very upset after the video, it was very sad. Some people would shake it but they were weird about it, they weren't happy, it was upsetting to them,” said Angelina, a 7th grader.
It's believed the concerned parent's son was in the class last week. The parent then posted on Facebook that "some kids found this hilarious and beat the snot out of that baby, throwing it against the wall."
A blogger picked up on this and used the post with the headline "Middle School Kids Learn How to SHAKE BABIES UNTIL THEY DIE."
Angelina believes this topic may be too advanced for 7th graders.
"There's some people in my grade that aren't as mature, can't take it as much. I don't know how to explain it. Maybe they're not as grown up and don't understand it as much."
- See more at: http://rochester.twcnews.com/content/news/746620/churchville-chili-student-says-not-everyone-could-handle-shaken-baby-syndrome-lesson/#sthash.4z7jhUsD.dpuf
A class at Churchville-Chili Middle School intended to teach students the dangers of Shaken Baby Syndrome is drawing controversy, after a Facebook post by a parent questioning the subject matter took on a life of its own.
The school district has investigated, and said in a statement that the allegations are not accurate, but said in the future, a counselor will be on hand in the classroom during the lesson.
The class is Family and Consumer Sciences. It's designed to prepare students to become life ready.
- See more at: http://rochester.twcnews.com/content/news/746620/churchville-chili-student-says-not-everyone-could-handle-shaken-baby-syndrome-lesson/#sthash.4z7jhUsD.dpuf
A class at Churchville-Chili Middle School intended to teach students the dangers of Shaken Baby Syndrome is drawing controversy, after a Facebook post by a parent questioning the subject matter took on a life of its own. 
The school district has investigated, and said in a statement that the allegations are not accurate, but said in the future, a counselor will be on hand in the classroom during the lesson. 
The class is Family and Consumer Sciences. It's designed to prepare students to become life ready.
- See more
Hard to tell if this is over-reaction on the part of a few students or a not fully thought through presentation on the part of the instructor ( and let me say that I've been to a few NYS FCS meetings and talked to several FCS classes, and the teachers I've met there are an amazing group of talented educators).

I was invited to talk to a sixth grade class at one of our middle schools.  When I asked how many of the kids were babysitting, it turned out about 10% were taking care of siblings under age 5, and some were caring for siblings as young as 1.  And almost none had taken any sort of babysitting class...

We didn't use a demo doll, but we did watch a video: the older version of Portrait of Promise, not the version with the more realistic computer animation.

It required some thinking on how to phrase things, but the kids seemed to get the point that bad things could happen if they lost their temper, and they needed to be prepared to cope with frustration.

Personally, I think the Baby Think It Over simulator dolls, which have a random crying mode that can last a half-hour, are more useful in teaching that lesson than the SBS simulator dolls.

Kids are caring for kids.  They need to know how to do it right.

Hope this school board doesn't do what many seems do when "controversy" strikes: take the easy way out and stop doing whatever it was that caused a complaint.

Teaching about SBS

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Hospital Based Education in the UK...Cheers Northumbria and NSPCC!

Good news from the UK!

Education for new parents about what they can do to help keep their child safe is always a good thing...Cheers!



Baby advice for new parents


Jane Scott NSPCC with Tanya Mason Northumberland
Jane Scott NSPCC with Tanya Mason Northumberland

A new programme that aims to support new parents with the stress they can feel when their baby cries is being piloted in Berwick.
The Coping with Crying programme will see community midwives from Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust showing new parents a powerful film about caring for a crying baby.
Looking after a crying baby can be challenging and parents can sometimes struggle to soothe their baby. Concerns about babies’ crying are one of the most common reasons that new parents seek help from professionals.
When their baby cries, it is common for parents to feel frustrated, and in the worst cases they can lose their temper and harm their baby.
The NSPCC estimate that around 200 babies a year in the UK suffer from serious head injuries as the result of being shaken, hit or thrown. Evidence shows that crying is often a trigger for this sort of harm.
The NSPCC film provides parents with a range of supportive tips and advice about soothing a baby and managing their own stress. It also tells them about the dangers of shaking a baby.
It was created in partnership with experts at Warwick Medical School and Great Ormond Street Hospital, and is based on a similar programme in America which reduced the number of babies who suffered from non-accidental head injuries by nearly half.
Janice McNichol, head of midwifery at Northumbria Healthcare, said: “We fully understand that caring for a new-born baby can be extremely stressful – particularly for new parents - and we are committed to providing the highest quality support to mums and their partners.
“Our community midwives are parents’ first port of call following the birth and offer expert advice on how best to care for their baby.
“We are always looking at research and finding new ways of helping to safeguard our most vulnerable patients and have been using the NSPCC’s ‘Handle with Care’ leaflet for more than a year.
“We are delighted to work in partnership with them on this pilot and provide an additional resource to help parents cope with a crying baby while raising awareness of the potential risks of these situations.”
Over the last two years the NSPCC has been running this programme in 24 hospitals and birthing units and over 30,000 parents have now seen the film.
Chris Cuthbert, head of strategy and development for the NSPCC said: “This is a ground-breaking new programme based on the best international evidence. It is a relatively simple and low cost intervention, and our evaluation shows that it is helping parents to manage the pressures of new parenthood and soothe their baby.”
Cathy Warwick, chief executive of the Royal College of Midwives, added: “Midwives see first-hand the stress and worry that parents experience when their baby cries, and need to support parents through this. Everyone looking after a baby needs to know that shaking can have very serious consequences. The NSPCC film helps midwives to communicate this important but difficult message.”

Friday, September 06, 2013

Military Families and Shaken Baby Syndrome: Not Better, Not Worse

Researchers at the Kempe Center, at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, have found that an infant in a military family has about the same risk of suffering head trauma from violent shaking as civilian babies. Department of Defense records show between 26 and 34 out of every 100,000 babies born into military families had substantiated abusive head trauma in the first year of life. That was similar to civilian rates during the study period. As Reuters Health reports:
However, "Within the military there are some children who are particularly at higher risk, including the children of enlisted men," said Dr. Desmond Runyan, director of the Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse and Neglect at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora. 
Baby boys, as well as those born early or with birth defects, were also at increased risk for shaken baby syndrome. So were infants with young mothers, parents in lower pay grades or mothers in the military. Babies between two and four months old are at the highest risk of shaken baby syndrome, which can cause seizures and permanent brain damage. One in four children with the condition dies as a result.
In general, shaken baby syndrome is most common among families who are poor, have little social support and are under stress, Runyan and his colleagues said. Inconsolable crying is one of the main triggers for shaking. "These risk factors for shaken baby syndrome can get magnified a little bit due to the stresses of being in the military," Runyan told Reuters Health.
Many military families are removed from their extended families, live in lower-quality housing and earn relatively low wages, all of which could make child abuse more likely, he said. On the other hand, being in the military may protect against some forms of abuse, like neglect, since members of the military have to pass an aptitude test, have steady employment and have access to family support programs. Past studies on the topic have been inconsistent: some showed an increased risk for shaken baby syndrome among military babies, while others failed to show a link.
One issue, Runyan said, is that some of those studies were done on military training bases where there are a lot of young families - so the results may represent the experience of mostly higher-risk infants. For the new study, the researchers looked at Department of Defense medical records for 676,827 infants born between 1998 and 2005 and linked them to investigative findings from military family advocacy programs confirming cases of abuse. Of those infants, 230 had substantiated shaken baby syndrome and 73 had probable or possible shaken baby syndrome.
Using U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for a diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome, the researchers calculated there were 34 substantiated cases in the first year of life for every 100,000 military babies during the study period. They then did the same analysis with criteria that have been used to study shaken baby syndrome among civilians, which produced a rate of about 26 cases per 100,000 babies. That is similar to the 28 cases per 100,000 infants found in a past study of civilian babies in 2000, the researchers write in Pediatrics.
Gia Gumbs, who led the study at the Naval Health Research Center in San Diego, California, told Reuters Health in an email that studies of civilian families "may underestimate the number of cases" of shaken baby syndrome if they use less sensitive criteria for diagnosis.
One hopeful note:
"The military has been very responsive and active to the concerns raised about shaken baby syndrome in infants," Runyan said.
SOURCE: bit.ly/15tWduU Pediatrics

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Safer Child Care: Comment Period on HHS regulations

A window briefly reopened for comment on proposed health and safety changes to the federal child care regulations.
 
The federal government announced today that  it will extend the comment period on proposed changes to its Child Care and Development Fund regulations to August 23, 2013.
 
The changes are intended to strengthen health and safety requirements.

This is an opportunity to point out 
the importance of requiring training and 
education for child care providers, about the vulnerability of young children 
to inflicted head injury and about the need to have coping skills for the inevitable moments of frustration and anger that come with caring for young children.

That message can come from anyone who knows a child 
affected by an inflicted head injury, but the parents of a child injured by a care provider can perhaps best emphasize the point.
Nationwide standards for education about SBS and the vulnerability of young children 
to inflicted head injuries would not cover all child care providers, but it would be a good start.  

A national standard could also provide impetus and motivation for child care providers 
to talk with parents and other caregivers, not just to keep children safe, but to keep themselves safe.

The Federal Register Notice has instructions for submitting comments.  Link to Notice
Notice:
 
This announcement is to notify you that the Office of Child Care (OCC) has reopened the comment period for the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (78 FR 29441). Today a notice was published in the Federal Register to formally reopen the comment period for 10 days. Public comments on the proposed rule are due by 11:59 p.m. (eastern daylight time) on Friday, August 23. Comments can be submitted electronically by visiting the Federal Register Web site link below, or you can submit written comments to the following address: Office of Child Care; Aerospace Building, Fifth Floor East; 370 L’Enfant Promenade, S.W.; Washington, DC 20024; Attention: Cheryl Vincent, Office of Child Care.


 
 

Monday, May 27, 2013

It's the same all over: perspective on child abuse reporting in Malaysia

The topic of the study abstracted below was child abuse reporting in the Malaysian press, but the conclusions are relevant to media reporting in the US.

The mainstream press largely reports on the consequences of child abuse: the death and injury of a child, the tragedy that falls suddenly on a family, and, far less less frequently than one might expect, the punishment of the perpetrator.

It is the uncommnon story that examines the circumstances that precipitated the abuse.  Even less common is the story that looks at prevention programs.

The coverage of cases varies inversely with how well we can understand it.  A simple search on Google News shows that the most uncommon cases, involving horrendous cases of deliberate and persistent physical abuse, are picked up by hundreds of media outlets across the nation.  The much more common case of a parent or caregiver losing control and inflicting injury on a crying infant rarely reaches outlets outside of the community in which it happens.

Allow me to offer two possible reasons.

First, those horrendous acts of physical violence transgress some of our strongest norms and define evil for many.  The perpetrators of such acts are beyond the pale, and such acts mark foreign territory for most of us.  By allowing us to divide and define the world into good and evil, in which evil acts are done by bad people unlike us - "them" - they help define "us."   Framing child abuse properly aids understanding, and understanding aids prevention.  Good work on framing from PCAA.

Second, acts of momentary rage violate the same norms, but are far too understandable for many.  To the extent that the perpetrator is someone like ourselves, it creates cognitive dissonance, and we struggle for explanation.  Those stories are not consistent with our division of the world, as "good" people do bad things.  So, we look less deeply, and the grey areas of the story attract less media interest.

For example, Google Trends shows differential responses to "shaken baby" and "Casey Anthony."

The final point of interest: society seems to devolve blame on the mother.  The universality of that response especially obvious if you read the comments on most shaken baby news stories.  A substantial proportion blame the mother for her choice of caregiver or just for putting the child in child care.

And so we justify our choices.

Unfortunately, many comments suggest that some still feel parents are invulnerable to the circumstances that precipitate abuse.  The statistics show otherwise, and those who believe that "good" parents are not at risk of haring their child simply have acquired a false sense of security.
The ‘social tsunami’: Media coverage of child abuse in Malaysia’s English-language newspapers in 2010
Sara Niner  Monash University, Australia
Yarina Ahmad Monash University, Australia
Denise Cuthbert School of Graduate Research RMIT University, Australia
  1. Sara Niner, Sociology, School of Political and Social Inquiry, Monash University, Building H Caulfield Campus (H.5.43) 900 Dandenong Road, Victoria 3145, Australia. Email: sara.niner@monash.edu
Abstract
Since the early 1990s, Malaysian society has displayed a deepening concern over steady increases in reported cases of child abuse in the country. For many Malaysians, knowledge of this issue comes from the mainstream media. This research analyses media coverage of child abuse in two mainstream English-language daily newspapers throughout 2010.
The analysis focuses on how this issue is presented and ‘framed’ in the media. Through the use of simple episodic framing and a distorted focus on extreme cases of child abuse, media coverage internationally obscures the reality of child abuse as it occurs within the context of contemporary social, cultural, religious or political systems. This hinders any genuine understanding of the problem, leading to flawed solutions. We find these international patterns largely replicated in Malaysia.
Furthermore, gendered socialization processes in Malaysia make women and mothers principally responsible for family life and there is a tendency to blame and punish mothers for child abuse even when they are not the perpetrators. Internationally, child welfare experts and academics have advised the media to focus reporting on the underlying causes of abuse so that the issue can be better understood and addressed and this advice is pertinent for Malaysia today.  

Sunday, February 03, 2013

From Boston MA to Enid OK, Missing the Real Point on Keeping Babies Safe

From the Enid News & Eagle, a reminder that there is often an interesting contrast between the words said, and the headline that results..

Shaken baby syndrome often happens with first-time parentsBy Phyllis Zorn, Staff WriterEnid News & EagleENID, Okla. — Marie Holsten, district director for Oklahoma Department of Human Services, said incidents of shaken baby syndrome often happen with first-time parents, but that’s not always the scenario.
Shaking of the baby can happen when the child is in the care of anyone not prepared to deal with the crying, or when the person caring for the child already is overwhelmed and frustrated by other things, and the crying of the baby becomes the trigger that prompts their frustration to boil over, she said. 

It's actually a fairly good article, as far as it goes.  However, this is how it ends:
Holsten emphasizes parents should be mindful of who they leave in charge of their children.
“A lot of people are going back to work,” Holsten said. “Make sure you get a licensed day care provider. You need to be careful who you are leaving your child with.”
While there's nothing wrong with recommending that parents hire a licensed day care provider, there's much more than needs to be done besides checking for a license (it should be no surprise that not everyone who claims to be licensed actually is...).  My thoughts:

Good article, but hiring a licensed day care provider is not sufficient by itself:  a parent needs to take three more steps. 
 First, ask every caregiver if they know that children as old as 5 years of age are vulnerable to an inflicted head injury, and if they have participated in a safety education program that included info about shaken baby prevention.  Second, ask if they have a coping plan for the inevitable moments of frustration.  Third, give them permission to call you if there are times when they need to talk.  
If it feels awkward, ask yourself if you'd rather leave your baby with someone who doesn't know how vulnerable babies and infants are, who doesn't have a plan to cope, and who is going to be afraid to call you if they need to.
If it still feels awkward, just let the caregiver know that you only want to help her (or him) know what they need to know to help you keep the child safe.
The advice from Enid is not much different than this MD blogger who writes on the Boston.com site

Three things parents can do to keep their child safe from child abuse
Posted by Dr. Claire McCarthy  January 23, 2013 11:25 AM
While this is really understandable, I think that instead of just being terrified we should use this as a moment to really think about what we can do to keep children safe from child abuse. While nothing can prevent all abuse, there are things that parents can do. Here are three:  
Never shake a baby. Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS), which is when children are shaken hard enough to cause brain damage, is the leading cause of child abuse death in the United States. The most common reason SBS happens? Inconsolable crying. When you mix a baby that won't stop screaming with a stressed-out, overwhelmed caregiver, bad things can and do happen.
If you've got a baby that screams a lot, check in with your doctor--but often it's just normal crying. And in those cases, you need to take care of not just your baby but yourself. Sometimes the best way to care for both of you is to put the baby in a safe place, like his crib, and take a moment to calm down. Here in Massachusetts, you can call the Parental Stress Hotline at 800-632-8188.
Make sure that everyone who cares for your child knows the dangers of shaking. To learn more about SBS and how to prevent it, visit the CDC's Heads Up: Prevent Shaken Baby Syndrome website.
Know the signs of child abuse. It's not always obvious. The Department of Health and Human Services has a fact sheet that has all sorts of information about recognizing abuse and neglect, but here are some of the signs that parents and caregivers should watch for:
  • Any unexplained bruise or other injury (or an explanation for one that doesn't make sense)
  • Frequent bruises or injuries, even if an explanation is given
  • Changes in behavior, such as acting withdrawn, sad, angry or afraid. An occasional off day is usually normal, but if the changes are persistent or recurrent it could be a sign of a problem.
  • Changes in appetite or sleep (including trouble falling asleep, nightmares, or bedwetting). Again, only worrisome if persistent--and there can be lots of other explanations.
  • Behaviors or statements from children that are odd or not normal for their age (like talking about sex)
  • Negative comments about the child from the parent or caregiver--and/or lack of nurturing/happy interactions with child
  • The child expresses fear or dislike of the parent/caregiver
Remember--these are just a few of the signs, and could have other explanations. But if you see them, let someone know--like your doctor, or the Department of Children and Families.
Check out all your child's caregivers thoroughly. If you use a daycare center or family daycare, be sure that they are licensed--and check with your local licensing board to find out if there have ever been any concerns or complaints. If you use a nanny or babysitter, do background checks--including in other states the person has lived. Since most child abuse happens when a child is left alone with a caregiver, doing your homework is really important. Get plenty of references. Ask lots of questions--and be sure you communicate with them regularly about your child's behavior and needs. Ask friends and neighbors who might interact with the nanny or babysitter to keep an eye out and let you know if anything concerns them--and make surprise visits regularly.
It's impossible to know everything about anybody, no matter how well you do your homework--that's what so scary about this. Keeping your antennae up can help; if for any reason something about a caregiver doesn't feel quite right to you, listen to that feeling. Don't ignore it. It's always better to be safe--after all, nothing will ever be more important than your child.
For more about how all of us can help to prevent child abuse, visit the website of Prevent Child Abuse America.
    This is what I said then (and I'll say it again):